[Members] minutes of XSF Annual Meeting, 2009-10-06

Mickaël Rémond mickael.remond at process-one.net
Wed Oct 7 03:48:07 CDT 2009


Le 7 oct. 2009 à 10:25, Remko Tronçon <remko at el-tramo.be> a écrit :
>> I feel that the XSF should go toward a more neutral, more open and  
>> more professional approach
> Not commenting on the XSF's direction, I don't understand why one
> would run for a position, and then afterwards claim that one wasn't
> interested or believed in it anyway. That feels like mocking the XSF
> members' judgement and trust, and doesn't help their credibility in
> the future.

I do not understand the connection between the two parts of your  
sentence. I think it was clear from my mail that I ran again because I  
wanted to defend my position once more.

I thought however that the way this went for the election result  
confirmed my feeling that my previous attempts would fail again this  
year and that it was more usefull to express my opinion on this  

This is the exact flame I was expecting but I do not see how my  
credibility is affected, on the contrary.

Anyway, I express myself on my feeling and what I think should be  
improved in the organisation. I did not made any personal attack. I  
felt I am partly responsible of the situation having been in the board  
last year.
Now please stop reacting by making personal attack. I am just trying  
to help.

Mickaël Rémond 

More information about the Members mailing list