[Members] minutes of XSF Annual Meeting, 2009-10-06
tmarkmann at googlemail.com
Wed Oct 7 17:06:57 CDT 2009
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Fabio Forno <fabio at bluendo.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Alexey Melnikov
> <alexey.melnikov at isode.com> wrote:
> >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sortition
> >>> Not a bad idea. Quarterly sounds like a good time period.
> >> It would certainly end the complaints about XSF members not having
> >> enough to do. ;-)
> > Indeed.
> > I think this might also help reduce size of XSF.
> I don't know if it can work, imho bodies like the council need some
> stability in time and one year of service is a good period. Perhaps
> it's better to require members taking part to special interests groups
> (e.g pubsub, social, server apps, mobile etc...) which should do the
> preliminary work for the council. This would speed up many things.
> Fabio Forno,
> Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
> jabber id: ff at jabber.bluendo.com
Well..discussions held in those SIGs could also take place in standards MLs.
Actually I personally don't miss SIGs. If there's interest in a topic it's
discussed on the standards ML and the council member usually take part
there. XEPs which are openly discussed there are easier to handle for the
council because more people looked at it and expressed their concerns and
ideas. However the council also has to check and proof the not that
interesting XEPs. Not interesting for a lot people so it's barely discussed
on the MLs i mean.
So in general the advice would be if you're in the XSF as a member you have
a chance to even reinforce your support for the XSF by either taking part in
technical discussion or if that's not that interesting help the XSF with one
of the other tasks the XSF needs the have done and according to Peter's post
that are quite a lot.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Members