[Members] XMPP at xmpp.org

[Dave Cridland]

On Fri Oct  9 08:20:08 2009, Florian Jensen wrote:
> I agree. 1. doesn't make any real sense, unless we would have   
> something like a shared roster with all the members on it.

Kevin and I have been muttering for some time about a remote shared  
group system. If we get around to getting something down on paper,  
this'd be a perfect use-case.

>  See it as  an easy way to get in touch with all members. It would  
> be a lot more  useful if we can get something like a message  
> forwarder :)

Well, jid transfer and forwarding is also something people have  
muttered about. (Kurt asked me about it many months past). This does  
at least give us a chance to consider what might be needed.

It's slightly worrying, isn't it, that we're a protocol design and  
development shop, yet the first time we consider actually running our  
own protocols, we suddenly realise we're missing bits we'd find  
useful...

Dave.
-- 
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave at cridland.net - xmpp:dwd at dave.cridland.net
  - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
  - http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade