[Members] XMPP at xmpp.org
dave at cridland.net
Fri Oct 9 04:15:34 CDT 2009
On Fri Oct 9 08:20:08 2009, Florian Jensen wrote:
> I agree. 1. doesn't make any real sense, unless we would have
> something like a shared roster with all the members on it.
Kevin and I have been muttering for some time about a remote shared
group system. If we get around to getting something down on paper,
this'd be a perfect use-case.
> See it as an easy way to get in touch with all members. It would
> be a lot more useful if we can get something like a message
> forwarder :)
Well, jid transfer and forwarding is also something people have
muttered about. (Kurt asked me about it many months past). This does
at least give us a chance to consider what might be needed.
It's slightly worrying, isn't it, that we're a protocol design and
development shop, yet the first time we consider actually running our
own protocols, we suddenly realise we're missing bits we'd find
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave at cridland.net - xmpp:dwd at dave.cridland.net
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
More information about the Members