[Members] XEP maintenance

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Feb 17 14:13:09 CST 2010


On 2/17/10 12:10 PM, Matthew Wild wrote:
> On 17 February 2010 18:51, bear <bear42 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> are you interested in trying to use something like Crucible (an
>> Atlassian product that enables code reviews) for this?
>>
>> I thought about it last night - each XEP would be in the code
>> repository and edits would get commited and then the reviewers would
>> use Crucible to markup and comment on the changes - once approved the
>> XEP would then be tagged to represent the current version.
>>
>> too complex?
> 
> It feels too much like cathedral building to me. I have also never
> been a fan of Crucible, Fisheye, or well any of the Atlassian products
> with (in my opinion) over-complicated UIs.
> 
> But this is just me, and I'm curious to know what other people think too.

I'm curious to know why every conversation quickly becomes a discussion
about tools. :)


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6820 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20100217/6c9e7be8/attachment.bin>


More information about the Members mailing list