[Members] XEP maintenance
zooldk at gmail.com
Wed Feb 17 15:10:21 CST 2010
On Feb 17, 2010, at 9:54 PM, bear wrote:
> I just wanted to bring up the idea - not worried if people want to
> keep it human centric.
> I use Crucible every day and it helps keep the tedium and drudgery out
> of code review and thought it would make a good process.
Me too.. I am really not trying to dictate anything, just to give out
some of my experience with a review process, that I am used to.
> Maybe I need to be more active in XEP maintainence in order to see if
> it really is a good fit - after all, you can't automate something if
> you don't know how it works :)
I do agree about that one. :-)
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 15:23, Matthew Wild <mwild1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 17 February 2010 20:13, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im>
>>> On 2/17/10 12:10 PM, Matthew Wild wrote:
>>>> On 17 February 2010 18:51, bear <bear42 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> are you interested in trying to use something like Crucible (an
>>>>> Atlassian product that enables code reviews) for this?
>>>>> I thought about it last night - each XEP would be in the code
>>>>> repository and edits would get commited and then the reviewers
>>>>> use Crucible to markup and comment on the changes - once
>>>>> approved the
>>>>> XEP would then be tagged to represent the current version.
>>>>> too complex?
>>>> It feels too much like cathedral building to me. I have also never
>>>> been a fan of Crucible, Fisheye, or well any of the Atlassian
>>>> with (in my opinion) over-complicated UIs.
>>>> But this is just me, and I'm curious to know what other people
>>>> think too.
>>> I'm curious to know why every conversation quickly becomes a
>>> about tools. :)
>> We're a fussy lot.
>> I'll use whatever is there and I won't complain if it works, I
>> promise. I just don't have good experiences, that's all. Then there's
>> this whole open-source vs commercial thing, but I won't even go there
> bear42 at gmail.com (xmpp, email)
> bear at code-bear.com (xmpp, email)
> http://code-bear.com/bearlog (weblog)
> PGP Fingerprint = 9996 719F 973D B11B E111 D770 9331 E822 40B3 CD29
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 1923 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Members