[Members] the "Proposed" state in XEP-0001

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Mar 10 15:29:11 CST 2011


I've effectively stopped using the "Proposed" state defined in XEP-0001
(too many specs went into Proposed during Last Call but had to be moved
back to Experimental because the authors needed to revise the XEP before
the Council would approve it, and sometimes they were in the Proposed
state for a long time). I wonder if we want to get rid of it entirely...

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6105 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20110310/949cc910/attachment.bin>


More information about the Members mailing list