[Members] the "Proposed" state in XEP-0001

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Mar 10 16:13:11 CST 2011


On 3/10/11 3:12 PM, Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
> 
> On Mar 10, 2011, at 1:29 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 
>> I've effectively stopped using the "Proposed" state defined in XEP-0001
>> (too many specs went into Proposed during Last Call but had to be moved
>> back to Experimental because the authors needed to revise the XEP before
>> the Council would approve it, and sometimes they were in the Proposed
>> state for a long time). I wonder if we want to get rid of it entirely...
> 
> +1
> 
> What about Reject?  The state digram shows the only way to Reject is via Proposed.

The Council hasn't moved anything to Rejected since 2002, and then only
at a single meeting.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6105 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20110310/977fbe35/attachment.bin>


More information about the Members mailing list