[Members] the "Proposed" state in XEP-0001

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Mar 10 16:37:21 CST 2011


On 3/10/11 3:36 PM, Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
> 
> On Mar 10, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>>
>>> Can you clarify 'that' here?  'that' could refer to 'document remains in the Experimental state' or could refer to 'moved to a dead-end state'.
>>
>> It remains Experiemental. Essentially, the Council asks the author(s) to
>> "revise and resubmit".
> 
> If moving to Reject isn't the current practice, that's all the more reason to update XEP-001 to state that Council can leave the document in Experimental.

Rightio. I'll work on a bit of a cleanup sometime after IETF 80.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6105 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20110310/21a54c6f/attachment.bin>


More information about the Members mailing list