[Members] ANNUAL MEETING NOTICE
dave at cridland.net
Wed Oct 26 18:47:59 UTC 2011
On Wed Oct 26 18:07:52 2011, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> My apologies, but I did not understand that those were the options.
> thought we were (a) not re-opening the application period (was
> there a
> reason to do that?)
The reasoning was that if we were basically saying that there was an
issue which meant that some people were unable to formally apply by
the deadline, and were letting those specific people who had made
this known through, there may be others we didn't know about who were
unable (or, perhaps, too embarrassed) to mention it, so we needed to
reopen to be entirely fair.
The alternative would be to say that they had simply missed the
deadline, and too bad.
As it happens, I lean heavily toward any chance of getting more
> and (b) restarting the voting process.
Which I think there was no real question about.
It seems I'm the only one arguing that anything has gone wrong here,
so this will be my final post on the matter.
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave at cridland.net - xmpp:dwd at dave.cridland.net
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
More information about the Members