[Members] Google and XMPP federation
bear at bear.im
Sun May 26 18:41:23 UTC 2013
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 05/26/2013 01:12 PM, Ralph Meijer wrote:
> Dave Cridland <dave at cridland.net> wrote:
>> Sorry for the top posting, on the phone, but I do think we should
>> be putting together a detailed rebuttal on technical grounds.
>> If Google wishes to create a walled garden for business reasons,
>> they're free to do that, despite my strong feelings that this is
>> not the best solution for their users. Their shareholders are
>> their primary concern, I do appreciate this.
>> I do however see no possible excuse for their constant
>> misinformation about XMPP, and their attempts to justify a
>> business decision on false technical grounds, at our expense as
>> an organisation and individually, must be challenged.
>> I'm happy to devote some time to this rebuttal.
> As am I. Also, feel free to use any of the text I wrote about this
> since last week.
I would suggest that Ralph put the beginnings of an outline into the
wiki or a piratepad (suggesting Ralph because his article already has
the structure IMO.)
The people can backfill information and/or events and the text can be
pulled from that.
xmpp agitator; ops curmudgeon; generalist
0A93 9BA7 8203 FCBC 58A9 E8B5 9D1E 0661 8EE5 B4D8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Members