[Members] [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0345 (Form of Membership Applications)
kevin at kismith.co.uk
Fri Jul 25 16:25:03 UTC 2014
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Dave Cridland <dave at cridland.net> wrote:
> NEW TEXT:
> Relevant Affiliations
> Any affiliations, as described within the final clause of the XSF Bylaws,
> Section 2.1. Note that this is not limited to employment, but must include
> it. Other relevant affiliations include any other organization the applicant
> may represent.
> In other words, I not only have to mention Surevine, but Openfire, too. And
> if we get too many Openfire developers - and trust me I'd love to have this
> problem - this could reject that application under the 15% rule.
I don't think 'represent' is the right word. I do not represent Isode
in my XSF dealings (explicitly not), but I suspect people would still
consider it an affiliation.
More information about the Members