[Members] Fwd: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Form of Membership Applications
stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Mar 12 22:47:08 UTC 2014
On 3/12/14, 4:06 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On 12 March 2014 18:22, Mike Taylor <bear at bear.im <mailto:bear at bear.im>>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On 03/12/2014 01:31 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > On 2/26/14, 12:49 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> >> This is relevant to all members.
> >> Like all new submissions, it's purely a personal proposal at this
> >> stage, and so has no force whatsoever.
> >> If and when nobody on the Board objects to it, it'll then become
> >> Experimental - again, like all new XEPs - which means it still
> >> has no force, but we (the members) will own it, and be be
> >> actively working to get it into a shape where the Board can
> >> Approve it, making it Active.
> >> Once Active, it *will* have force, and its title is a reference
> >> to a passage in the by laws which discusses membership
> >> applications.
> >> Therefore, please read and discuss.
> > Sorry about the delayed reply.
> > I think it would be helpful for us to provide a form of membership
> > application since that is mentioned in the bylaws:
> +1 to this and I feel that the XEP can be the place to set the items
> I'm obviously in favour, but I'll note that I interpreted "form" as a
> legal term in the sense of required elements rather than preformatted
> page boxes you fill in.
> > "to be eligible for membership, a person, corporation,
> > organization, or other entity must complete a written membership
> > application in such form as shall be adopted by the Board of
> > Directors from time to time."
> > -- http://xmpp.org/about-xmpp/xsf/xsf-bylaws/
> > I was surprised to see (or remember) that the bylaws allow
> > membership by entities other than natural persons. I will propose
> > separately that we modify the bylaws to allow only natural persons
> > to be members. This will simplify the Form of Membership
> > Application a bit.
> also +1
> I'm happy to modify the bylaws as well to disallow corporate entities.
> (Or rather, I'm happy for someone else to do it, and will grudgingly
> volunteer if nobody else wants to).
Having written, I think, all of the previous proposals to modify the
bylaws, I'm happy to do so again.
More information about the Members