[Members] Feedback on votes

[David Banes]

+1  (yes from your friendly lurker)...

> If you're developing XMPP software and/or involved in the standards processes then you belong here. End of story.


I'd add "if you have a wealth of experience in..."

I've been a [silent] member for years, haven't helped a lot simply because I don't have the time, been the Chariman for a year where I found it impossible to get anything done (so hats off to those than do).

I no longer write XMPP code, BUT I do offer lot's of help and support to customers and others in the IM space often recommending XMPP solutions and occasionally making a few quid from those services I offer.

Even if my renewal was declined I'd still do the same, but I do value the stuff I read on the lists and have a genuine long term interest in the technology.

David.

On 13 May 2016, at 10:44, Arc Riley <arcriley at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 5:36 AM, Kevin Smith <kevin.smith at isode.com> wrote:
> 
> Beyond the vote count, I don’t think it’d be healthy to share information on why people voted as they did publicly.
> 
> Exactly.
> 
> All it'd serve is further a few people's obsession with pleasing everyone. Lets just drop this.
> 
> If you're developing XMPP software and/or involved in the standards processes then you belong here. End of story.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20160513/dac02bbf/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/members/attachments/20160513/dac02bbf/attachment.sig>