[Members] Changes to XSF Board tenure?
nicolas.verite at gmail.com
Fri Aug 24 13:17:12 UTC 2018
I'd go for it if it wasn't an overhead to setup, given all the comments
I observe that some board members re-apply, among which some are re-elected
the next year, which makes some of the continuity.
Also, continuity-wise, members who apply are seasoned, and members
generally tend to elect the most qualified.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:39 PM Guus der Kinderen <
guus.der.kinderen at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
> The XSF board has discussed the following, and seeks member input (that
> means *you*) on the following suggestion.
> Most XSF members will know that the XSF board currently consists of
> members that are appointed for one year. The entire board is replaced each
> Board likely benefits from more continuity, particularly by reducing the
> ramp down and ramp up period in which the board gets replaced, which can
> take up a considerable amount of time.
> To improve the effectiveness of Board, I suggest we consider changing our
> process, to prevent the entire board from being replaced at the same time.
> The XSF could, for instance, appoint board members for two years instead of
> one, and replace half of the board members every year.
> What do you think? Is such a change worth considering?
Nicolas Vérité (Nÿco)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Members