[Operators] Future of XMPP Re: The Google issue

Aryo Sandiyudo asandiyudo at mayplaces.com
Tue Dec 3 02:26:15 UTC 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I do not know what exactly the definition of push notification that you mean, but for your information that in http://mayplaces.com we have already implement push notifications for new mail (Mail to XMPP).

And as far as i know there is already an XMPP client that provides push notifications for offline message though to use the ad-free version you have to spend a few dollars.


- -- -
aRyo S
http://mayplaces.com


0x6A727933.asc - https://db.tt/aht0U2Wq

On Dec 3, 2013, Maxim Ignatenko <gelraen.ua at gmail.com> wrote:
>On 28 November 2013 12:44, Solomon Peachy <pizza at shaftnet.org> wrote:
>> Without Google, XMPP (S2S) simply doesn't have enough of a mass
>userbase
>> to be viable, IMO.  The mass markey simply doesn't care about
>technical
>> "quality".  (Witness every mobile-messaging-app-du-jour overnight
>ending
>> up with more users than non-google S2S-enabled XMPP..)
>
>That's because there is no:
>1) push notifications support for Android/iOS in popular server
>implementations
>2) decent mobile client
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.0.9

iQFHBAEBAgAxBQJSnUFHKhxBcnlvIFNhbmRpeXVkbyA8YXNhbmRpeXVkb0BtYXlw
bGFjZXMuY29tPgAKCRAP0JnXanJ5MyDjB/9qgTKnmFl+kcaAD+7yDs/G4oyWR9/A
51ZbOf4uRhTHqOjsDJc8KGkK3pLwcWwZp+SRUL5OmtfzoPRYl0AVR8w5Uet0jyl7
LwN2R6zG+XnMLJErfccBUsWdeON3ZfeknhDK++8psbPBa+MeuvsyeyLkQUQVpnMw
9qQne/QIz5T4xy24E+fh8GLr2hAGfds3l2ph4aN6WTKFL6kcaI70EYsh3A4t5eH3
P1iVyrI74zbKy8EdkRVEtB/Tvws0RDiZ2PqeUfwaz2x0LDtDTCwcsmVshS2P6QPc
F1Mvc2OTqIN3ip6c8TqTtBRdHozP+XApn9/KKG5L/SL7/J8vjfvNw2dW
=EDCm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Operators mailing list