[Operators] google abandoning XMPP??

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed May 22 18:30:59 UTC 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 5/22/13 12:27 PM, Philipp Hancke wrote:
> Am 22.05.2013 18:40, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
>> I think it was a bit over-the-top for Chee Chew to claim that
>> the "majority" of the server-to-server connectivity to the Google
>> Talk service was established by "organizations or individuals
>> looking to bombard Google Talk users with chat spam".
> 
> https://developers.google.com/events/io/sessions/331838045 at
> 56:00 with the exact quote at 57:30.
> 
> So the protocol isn't as rich as they want... guess they haven't 
> understood the "x" part in xmpp.

Well, I see no reason for us to act the jilted lover. :-) We had an
on-and-off affair (2005-2013) but XMPP predated Google Talk and now we
start the post-Google years.

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRnQ7jAAoJEOoGpJErxa2py6sQAKVSg92NbnZV+x2KRfokpBpb
FvaYJqCTvi/QDW1Gjrbp9rDbSe9V2wy5Z/RVXlzHYgBu+PuuyOFq0kzwpowAVqFa
d/YFwxsE+JP2FCTehkaTx+mA6zHKtgWWqGDnJfnaSXWkn+bYPGuoTtSwzQLH/j8e
d8PHAL5+AIOa4Xmh270WGvWG9M4tDoZBHFLFf7C9Z1EqweMt2w0K5MnolAESgkmr
Re/z1WEFRqqLj0lQLNjApgc47H0JyDeTk3ligjwg+R9YsClhMhOFIAlBPUsy9rg8
8uMEIUePJxCy8MeSZ0AHFRLB5BpUb9d3RTg9t1av3g1dVFiMnGQ4vUHQSdQ46Ykt
m4OAPYtJ7tVMQLFRyxJrhHdnUfcpqQ+l+qrFE9gNOIWqMxpgJwLHay89R8wpgNrr
5L14C6h18sZC36wJRhwVRz4pr0OPwwIKnqVeLeLXlJ0YntDtRTOS+bmbTnlfgwPR
PIZJ9Za/nkvS4lEUvQRXC+Xd8StQfQ/ehW3JY9pS2uhobrOmWKin/3Q/vz96NBiF
BJWOFPf/ydtk7YPhpclFF0xxDBPupYR3Uj9Cg6ETNopE5XdvvcfWuC521Fm2k6te
WGU6pD9j7bdRTVugjjF6YSOj52zaUoJhPqPQfPa46YIAhPy5qwkj0mnG54e0MYma
AXAaCf5MaLwtr+39ICc/
=aXQH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Operators mailing list