[Security] Re: e2e feedback
stpeter at jabber.org
Fri Mar 16 17:18:45 CDT 2007
Matthias Wimmer wrote:
> But still I keep saying that the protocol we are looking for is XML
> Signature and XML Encryption, that have been defined by the W3C.
> This are standards specially made to sign and encrypt XML data, so it is
> exactly what we need. And even while I asked on the standards JID, nobody
> could yet tell me, what would be a problem with this standards.
FWIW, Peter Guttmann has some piquant things to say about xmlenc/xmldsig
Though he also thinks that RFC 3923 was a great idea, so YMMV...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/security/attachments/20070316/c5f06847/smime.bin
More information about the Security