[Security] ESessions Feedback

[Peter Saint-Andre]

Ian Paterson wrote:

> That makes a lot of sense to me. If we decide to go the ESessions route 
> then I'd be happy to produce an option-free "subset" version of 
> ESessions. I'd cut out major features like public keys (SAS and retained 
> secrets would stay), and the optional 3-message negotiation.

Some smaller hills for developers to climb would be good. :)

/psa

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7358 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/security/attachments/20070327/b5a21b24/smime.bin