[Security] client-to-client security :: Summary and todo's

Pavel Simerda pavlix at pavlix.net
Sun Aug 24 04:21:52 CDT 2008


On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 11:02:17 +0200
Dirk Meyer <dmeyer at tzi.de> wrote:

> David Banes wrote:
> > On 24/08/2008, at 6:28 PM, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> >
> >>> 2) Most companies will want a c2s solution as they will need to
> >>> scan, archive and audit content in the same way they for email now
> >>
> >> They do? It could be a nice optional feature but if they force me
> >> using c2s I go to a different provider.
> >
> > I'm talking about corporate implementations, where a company puts
> > tight controls on it's users communications or has a regulatory
> > requirement to do things like archiving.
> 
> Ok, in that case all discussion here about SAS or TLS comes to the
> same conclusion: companies will block it no matter what we design.
> 
> 
> Dirk
> 

*Some companies*, not *companies*. But otherwise it's perfectly
correct ;).

Pavel


-- 

Web: http://www.pavlix.net/
Jabber & Mail: pavlix(at)pavlix.net
OpenID: pavlix.net


More information about the Security mailing list