[Security] Reminder :: Draft feedback on "C2C authentication using TLS"

Jonathan Schleifer js-xmpp-security at webkeks.org
Mon Aug 25 05:15:03 CDT 2008


Am 25.08.2008 um 12:02 schrieb Pedro Melo:

> Why not use:
>
> <feature var='urn:xmpp:tmp:tlsauth' />
> <feature var='urn:xmpp:tmp:tlsauth:x509cert' />
> <feature var='urn:xmpp:tmp:tlsauth:pgpcert' />
> <feature var='urn:xmpp:tmp:tlsauth:srp' />


That's exactly what I proposed, but I won't call it tlsauth, because  
what should urn:xmpp:tmp:tlsauth be then? c2ctls would be better IMO.

--
Jonathan

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/security/attachments/20080825/4400ac3f/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Security mailing list