[standards-jig] JANA pt. 2

Thomas Muldowney temas at box5.net
Tue Aug 6 02:54:21 UTC 2002


This has been brought up before and the general consensus is that it
would just create more turmoil by having another system.  JEPs seem to
fill the niche fine.

--temas


On Mon, 2002-08-05 at 21:36, Adam Theo wrote:
> 
> 
> Ben Schumacher wrote:
> > It probably wouldn't be a
> > bad idea to write up a JEP to define the exact role of JANA, as a JEP may
> > be used to provide "information related to the functioning of the Jabber
> > Software Foundation."
> 
> Actually, I've been thinking that I should bring up my "Foundation 
> Enhancement Proposal" (FEP) idea. They would be non-protocol, 
> foundation-organization proposals that the Board (instead of the 
> Council) would vote on.
> 
> -- 
>      /\  Adam Theo, Age 23, Tallahassee FL USA
>     //\\   Email & Jabber: theo at theoretic.com
>    //  \\  Pager: (850) 709 7738
> =//====\\=
> //  ||  \\  Theoretic Solutions: http://www.theoretic.com
>      ||         "Building Ideas by Bringing them Together"
>      ||      Jabber Protocol: http://www.jabber.org
>      ||         "The Next Generation Communications Protocol"
>      ||  "A Free-Market Socialist Patriotic American Buddhist"
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig





More information about the Standards mailing list