[standards-jig] JNG Ramblings.

Thomas Muldowney temas at box5.net
Fri Aug 9 03:11:03 UTC 2002

It's hard for me to like it one way or the other without doing some code
to see what's actually easier, but I still want to hear comments from
both sides.  Mike's post is well laid out, and thoughtful, but this
isn't helpful.  Could you expound a bit more?


On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 12:09, Matthias Wimmer wrote:
> Hi Mike!
> Mike Lin wrote:
> >i've been coding these past few days on some JNG prototypes. nothing is
> >done yet, but to help get the juices flowing i wrote down some of the
> >things i'm aiming to do.
> >  
> >
> I still don't like a binary wire protocol. I know you like it very much, 
> but I think it's a stupid idea. (No more comments on this, but I wanted 
> to say this for a long time now *g*).
> Tot kijk
>    Matthias
> -- 
> Fon: +49-700 77007770		http://matthias-wimmer.de/
> Fax: +49-89 312 88654		jabber://mawis@charente.de
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/standards-jig

More information about the Standards mailing list