[standards-jig] Presence priority finetuning
julian at jabber.org
Tue Jul 2 20:13:05 UTC 2002
On Tue, 2002-07-02 at 15:29, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
> the first message was to test if the server supports it, the client
> could just dump the request to the server if it's not critical for the
> client to know that the request has been noted.
> if the client is just a normal client it would ofcourse just dump the
> data, normal clients couldn't care less if the server accepted it or
> not. and without that first test you get 2 packets, which would be the
> case with any other implementation too.
> The main thing is that if the client has to worry about not sending the
> first <presence/> before the server has a clear view of the needs of
> client, then the client should worry about sending the initial request
At this point, I don't feel like arguing about this any more:
1) I'd like to have the browse/disco thing decided on
2) I'd like it if they could be modify to present this priority
- if not, fine, but
3) I don't want *FOUR* new steps to the login procedure. browse/disco
would add 2. If you invent a new protocol then please try to keep the
login procedure uncomplicated.
That's all I'm saying because we're really wasting people's mailbox
space at this point.
More information about the Standards