[Standards-JIG] Call for Experience: JEP-0030 (Service Discovery)
ian.paterson at clientside.co.uk
Mon Apr 26 18:36:30 UTC 2004
> > This seems to imply that child nodes cannot have
> > different jids to the parent node.
> I think you're reading too much into that statement.
Thanks for your explanation Peter.
> > Could you please make it clear whether a *node* may have children with
> > different jids.
> Sure, why not? Do you feel that needs to be more explicit in JEP-0030?
Yes. Even though it is not explicitly discouraged, it wasn't clear to me.
Possibly that was because all three examples feature children with the same
jid. How about a mixed example just to make it clear everything is allowed:
5. Query JID1+node1 for items, get back a list of items that includes:
More information about the Standards