[Standards-JIG] MUC+

Joe Hildebrand hildjj at gmail.com
Mon Dec 27 20:11:51 UTC 2004


If you wanted to refactor MUC, why don't you just say "support
JEP-50", and have all of the different grant/revoke use cases just be
commands?


On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 05:56:12 -0500, Nolan Eakins
<sneakin at semanticgap.com> wrote:
> I just sent my modifications to JEP-0045 to the JSF's editor. It's a pretty
> hefty edit, but should be more powerful. I have it up at
> "http://www.semanticgap.com/jeps/muc+.html". This is what I'm going to
> implement as Psi's MUC support. For the user interface I was wanting to do
> JEP-0045 was just to limited. It also incorporates some ideas that were on
> the standards-jig list recently and eliminates some inconsistencies that
> got introduced into 0045 as it aged.
> 
> Enjoy,
> Nolan
> --
> http://www.semanticgap.com/people/sneakin/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards-jig
> 


-- 
Joe Hildebrand



More information about the Standards mailing list