[Standards-JIG] JEP-0060: Comments on latest draft.
hildjj at gmail.com
Wed Jun 30 16:51:37 UTC 2004
Backward compatibility. There are lots of XMPP entities that don't
have full namespace-complete parsers.
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:38:14 +0200, Fabrice Desré - France Telecom
R&D/MAPS/AST <fabrice.desre at francetelecom.com> wrote:
> Jean-Louis Seguineau/EXC/ENG wrote:
> > P.S. On a more general stand, I have seen good remarks on this thread about
> > trying to minimize the size of the XML payload as much as possible. I would
> > only point out that using slightly shorter namespaces would definitively go
> > in the right direction, as this would decrease EVERY stanza's size
> > accordingly, not just one of them once and a while :)
> > I there a valid requirement to use http://jabber.org/protocol/muc (30
> > characters) instead of for example xmpp:muc (8 characters) ?
> Using namespace declaration and prefixes would also help to minimize
> XML size. Why redeclare the same namespaces on each stanza ? You can
> just declare xmlns:muc=http://jabber.org/protocol/muc on the root
> stream, and use the muc: prefix afterwards.
> Fabrice Desré
> France Télécom R&D/MAPS/AST
> Tél: +(33) (0)2 96 05 31 43
> Fax: +(33) (0)2 96 05 39 45
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
More information about the Standards