[Standards-JIG] SIP jep?

Ulrich Staudinger us at die-horde.de
Tue Mar 9 12:12:12 UTC 2004


Tony Yat-Tung Cheung wrote:
Do you recall why it was deferred?


>The JEP 111 defined something similar to how SIP and SDP works.
>
>www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0111.html
>
>However, the status of the JEP is deferred, I dont think anyone is working on it yet.
>
>Tony Cheung
>
>Ulrich Staudinger <us at die-horde.de> wrote:
>__________
>  
>
>>or wasn't there a SDP jep? i think to remember either SIP or SDP jep ..
>>
>>ulrich
>>
>>
>>
>>Ulrich Staudinger wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>can anyone point me to the SIP jep?
>>>thanks,
>>>ulrich
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Standards-JIG mailing list
>>>Standards-JIG at jabber.org
>>>https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/standards-jig
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Standards-JIG mailing list
>>Standards-JIG at jabber.org
>>https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/standards-jig
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Standards-JIG mailing list
>Standards-JIG at jabber.org
>https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/standards-jig
>
>  
>





More information about the Standards mailing list