[Standards-JIG] SIP jep?

Tony Yat-Tung Cheung tony.cheung at asiayeah.com
Tue Mar 9 13:06:00 UTC 2004


I am not aware of the reason.

Does anyone else know?

Thanks.

Tony

Ulrich Staudinger <us at die-horde.de> wrote:
__________
>Tony Yat-Tung Cheung wrote:
>Do you recall why it was deferred?
>
>
>>The JEP 111 defined something similar to how SIP and SDP works.
>>
>>www.jabber.org/jeps/jep-0111.html
>>
>>However, the status of the JEP is deferred, I dont think anyone is working on it yet.
>>
>>Tony Cheung
>>
>>Ulrich Staudinger <us at die-horde.de> wrote:
>>__________
>>  
>>
>>>or wasn't there a SDP jep? i think to remember either SIP or SDP jep ..
>>>
>>>ulrich
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Ulrich Staudinger wrote:
>>>
>>>    
>>>
>>>>can anyone point me to the SIP jep?
>>>>thanks,
>>>>ulrich
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Standards-JIG mailing list
>>>>Standards-JIG at jabber.org
>>>>https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/standards-jig
>>>>
>>>>      
>>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Standards-JIG mailing list
>>>Standards-JIG at jabber.org
>>>https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/standards-jig
>>>    
>>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Standards-JIG mailing list
>>Standards-JIG at jabber.org
>>https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/standards-jig
>>
>>  
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Standards-JIG mailing list
>Standards-JIG at jabber.org
>https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/standards-jig




More information about the Standards mailing list