[Standards-JIG] new top level tag?

Chris Mullins cmullins at winfessor.com
Wed Mar 10 17:32:04 UTC 2004

Richard Dobson [mailto:richard at dobson-i.net]:

[new top level tag]

>> You definitely have a point here. Servers need to support the 
>> routing of this new tag and IQ tags can deliver this specific 
>> content as well [...]

> True, but I think you would have a very hard time justifying the
> required to support this when we already have IQ, [...]

The only reason that would justify the new tag is if the routing and
processing rules are significantly different from IQ. If they are, then
a new tag is justified and fairly compelling. 

If the routing rules are the same as, or similar to, IQ, then it's not
worth looking at. 


More information about the Standards mailing list