[Standards-JIG] Re: XHTML-IM Conclusions
jajcus at bnet.pl
Thu Sep 9 06:31:56 UTC 2004
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 09:48:24AM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> So within the <body/> wrapper, the only structure would be provided by
> <div/> (though I think we might still need <p/> and <br/>)
<br/> is required IMHO. <p/> could be replaced by <div/>, but IMHO it is
better to leave <p/>, as most blocks in the IM text would be paragraphs
anyway. Of course <br/> must not be the child of <body/>, but of some
> , <ol/> and
> <ul/> (plus <li/> child), <a/>, and <img/>. All of the rendering would
> be provided by <span/> + CSS styles, and we would include more of the
> latter than we do right now.
Seems good to me.
More information about the Standards