[Standards-JIG] Re: XHTML-IM Conclusions

Jacek Konieczny jajcus at bnet.pl
Thu Sep 9 06:31:56 UTC 2004

On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 09:48:24AM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> So within the <body/> wrapper, the only structure would be provided by 
> <div/> (though I think we might still need <p/> and <br/>)

<br/> is required IMHO. <p/> could be replaced by <div/>, but IMHO it is
better to leave <p/>, as most blocks in the IM text would be paragraphs
anyway. Of course <br/> must not be the child of <body/>, but of some
other element.

> , <ol/> and 
> <ul/> (plus <li/> child), <a/>, and <img/>. All of the rendering would 
> be provided by <span/> + CSS styles, and we would include more of the 
> latter than we do right now.

Seems good to me.


More information about the Standards mailing list