[Standards-JIG] Re: XHTML-IM Conclusions
stpeter at jabber.org
Thu Sep 9 16:18:42 UTC 2004
In article <20040909063156.GA26989 at serwis2.beta>,
Jacek Konieczny <jajcus at bnet.pl> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 09:48:24AM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > So within the <body/> wrapper, the only structure would be provided by
> > <div/> (though I think we might still need <p/> and <br/>)
> <br/> is required IMHO. <p/> could be replaced by <div/>, but IMHO it is
> better to leave <p/>, as most blocks in the IM text would be paragraphs
> anyway. Of course <br/> must not be the child of <body/>, but of some
> other element.
> > , <ol/> and
> > <ul/> (plus <li/> child), <a/>, and <img/>. All of the rendering would
> > be provided by <span/> + CSS styles, and we would include more of the
> > latter than we do right now.
Version 0.17 of JEP-0071 implements things this way:
I will look into JD's suggestions today.
More information about the Standards