[Standards-JIG] Roster Subscription Synchronisation

Richard Dobson richard at dobson-i.net
Sat Sep 11 12:02:45 UTC 2004


If you really want to have the information attached to the presence (still 
the wrong place IMO) in a way that is virtually identical to JEP-0093 you 
should at least use JEP-0093 for this instead of inventing your own new 
protocol element.

Richard

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Dobson" <richard at dobson-i.net>
To: "Jabber protocol discussion list" <standards-jig at jabber.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Standards-JIG] Roster Subscription Synchronisation


> Is it just me or is this protocol not virtually identical to just using 
> JEP-0093?.
>
> The only thing missing from JEP-0093 is the use case explaining how to use 
> JEP-0093 with transports. Whats the point in it being like this?
>
> Richard
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "James Bunton" <james at delx.cjb.net>
> To: <standards-jig at jabber.org>
> Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 12:31 PM
> Subject: [Standards-JIG] Roster Subscription Synchronisation
>
>
>> I've written up a JEP for this protocol (formerly referred to as
>> roster-import).
>>
>> I've sent it to the JEP editor.
>>
>> Please have a look and send me comments.
>> http://msn-transport.jabberstudio.org/jep/roster-subsync/JEP-01XX.xml
>>
>> PS, if anybody knows how to convert that into HTML I'd like to know =)
>>
>> ---
>>
>> James
>> _______________________________________________
>> Standards-JIG mailing list
>> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
>> https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/standards-jig
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
> https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/standards-jig
> 





More information about the Standards mailing list