[Standards-JIG] Re: JEP-0054 vcard email definition is inconsistent

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at jabber.org
Wed Sep 15 03:51:22 UTC 2004


In article <cfd3c4d10409141544585d564 at mail.gmail.com>,
 Peter Millard <pgmillard at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 11:12:53 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre
> <stpeter at jabber.org> wrote:
> > In article <stpeter-D4554F.10563413092004 at sea.gmane.org>,
> >  Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at jabber.org> wrote:
> > Looking at this again, I see that the JEP-0054 DTD is quite far out of
> > line with the Dawson drafts and the damage is beyond repair. JEP-0054
> > was always intended to merely document what the Jabber community was
> > using (where we got vcard-temp I have no idea, since it is inconsistent
> > with the Dawson drafts in so many ways and this work was done before I
> > joined the Jabber community -- all I did was write up the documentation
> > in JEP form). 
> 
> History of the vcard-temp stuff can be found here:
> http://web.archive.org/web/20010605184608/http://www.vcard-xml.org/
> 
> Looks like v2 of the Dawson draft was used as the basis for
> vcard-temp. Thank god for the wayback machine :)
> 
> pgm.

Yes, I incorporated all that into JEP-0054 IIRC. But I still see some 
discrepancies between Dawson v2 and vcard-temp.

/psa




More information about the Standards mailing list