[Standards-JIG] Re: JEP-0054 vcard email definition is inconsistent

Jacek Konieczny jajcus at bnet.pl
Thu Sep 16 11:06:58 UTC 2004


On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 04:30:43PM +1000, trejkaz at xaoza.net wrote:
> I'm paranoid about implementing RDF in general.  Allowing so much flexibility
> is good in theory, but think of the poor people who have to write GUIs to
> display and edit this information, particularly when one fact could be written
> a dozen different ways in full RDF.  They can't even agree on whether
> rdf:about or rdf:resource is the proper attribute when listing information
> about another resource. :-/

So out JEPs should define some kind of guidelines or profiles for RDF
usage. So the basic data (e.g. everything from current vcard-temp)
should be written in a specific way, but the protocol would be still
extensible.

Greets,
	Jacek



More information about the Standards mailing list