[Standards-JIG] Re: Affiliation changes (JEP-0045)
jabber at dsutton.legend.uk.com
Tue Jan 18 21:05:51 UTC 2005
No objection from me - just waiting for 1.19 so I can work on syncronizing again.
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:34:33AM -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> In article
> <97B71C0C860DEC40A993AB9F7F0D433504803C at fattire.winfessor.com>,
> "JD Conley" <jd.conley at coversant.net> wrote:
> > > Well. Yes, the schemas do not restrict what you can send in the #admin
> > > vs. #owner namespace with regard to affiliation values. I see two
> > > options at this point:
> > >
> > > (1) Explicitly define which values of the 'affiliation' attribute are
> > > allowed in #admin vs. #owner.
> > >
> > > (2) Specify that all affiliation changes occur in queries qualified by
> > > the #admin namespace, reserving #owner for room creation,
> > configuration,
> > > and destruction.
> > >
> > > #1 seems rather abitrary, so I would lean toward #2.
> > I like #2 as well. Having it in both places is just confusing.
> I'm glad you like it, because that's what it in version 1.19 of the
> spec. :-)
> Anyone have objections?
> If not, I will seek to have the Council approve of version 1.19.
> Standards-JIG mailing list
> Standards-JIG at jabber.org
Email: dsutton at legend.co.uk
Jabber: peregrine at legend.net.uk
More information about the Standards