[Standards-JIG] Re: Dead participants in MU-conf, JEP-0045
jd.conley at coversant.net
Wed Jan 19 05:32:45 UTC 2005
> On Tuesday 18 January 2005 08:41 pm, JD Conley wrote:
> > > If sparks at jabber.org attempts to join jdev with nick 'Sparks' and
> > > sparks at jabber.org attempts to join jdev with nick 'CeruleanSparks'
> > > those are two different nicks and should be allowed. If
> > > sparks at jabber.org attempts to join jdev with nick 'Sparks' and
> > > later sparks at jabber.org attempts to join jdev /again/ with nick
> > > 'Sparks' then it should be treated like a resource conflict and
> > > older one should be booted off.
> > >
> > > At least, I think that's what JD Conley was suggesting?
> > Yes, that's what I was suggesting.
> This "booting off" stanza would be sent right back to the JID trying
> rejoin, which isn't going to buy you much. :)
Well, it lets everyone in the room know (possibly including yourself, if
your resource is the same) that the session was replaced by a new one.
Even if the error isn't sent, the occupant should still be replaced and
entry should not be denied.
More information about the Standards