[Standards-JIG] JEP-PubSub: open subscription model
wolf at bluehands.de
Wed Mar 30 16:02:10 UTC 2005
> Jabber provides quite a number of mechanisms for handling
>"request-response" services. There is no need to define yet another way
This is very interesting. I am talking about avatars and pubsub, because
I want to make my avatars work with JEP-0084. But I would really be
interested which other "request-response" services there are in Jabber?
I am open to other means. Which one would you suggest?
>Additionally, I think it is particularly inappropriate to
>attempt to handle "get" as part of a pubsub protocol since the
>and interaction patterns are completely different at their cores.
It seems particularly appropriate to me, because all subscription
protocol designers learn some day that a simple GET to the same data is
also useful. On the other hand most GET protocol designers are sad that
have only GET, but no subscriptions. What I have learned is that a GET
is the trivial form of SUBSCRIBE and a SUBSCRIBE is an extended GET,
however you want to look at it.
> While the pubsub protocol should *not* be modified to support
>operations, there is no reason why an implemented service can't support
>pubsub and get. Such a service would simply support both the JEP-0060
>protocols as well as the GET protocols of some other extension.
I don't see what other extension this would be. JEP-0060 already has GET
(8.1.10 Get Items for a Node). The question is only if this GET returns
without subscribe. Currently implementations tend to return "access
denied", even for "open" nodes, which is kind of weird.
Dr. Klaus H. Wolf
bluehands GmbH & Co.mmunication KG
+49 (0721) 16108 75
Jabber enabled Virtual Presence on the Web: http://www.lluna.de/
Open Source Future History: http://www.galactic-developments.com/
More information about the Standards