[Standards-JIG] Hop-to-hop reliablility
stpeter at jabber.org
Thu May 4 16:32:07 UTC 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Pavel Šimerda wrote:
> On 2006-05-01 21:34, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> That said, it is possible that upon further reflection the 2005-2006
>> Jabber Council would accept your proposal as a JEP after this thread has
>> ended (perhaps along with proposals from Dave Cridland or others).
> Is anything going on about per-hop acking? AFAIK there are two proposal, one
> from Justin Karneges and one from Dave Cridland.
> I liked Justin's simplicity... and scalability... acking groups of messages
> within reasonable time. Pings when server/client unsure about the connection
> (didn't get ack or didn't get data for a long time).
> Dave's synchronization points can be an alternative but... I don't understand
> them yet... it seems they're something like time-by-time both-sides
> aknowledgements of previous stanzas.
> Any news?
Personally, I have to catch up on the thread and understand what the
alternatives are before I post further. Will do that today or tomorrow.
Jabber Software Foundation
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 3641 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards