[Standards-JIG] Re: pubsub: wrapper or no wrapper for subscriptionauthorizations?

Gaston Dombiak gaston at jivesoftware.com
Fri May 5 14:28:26 UTC 2006


+1

"Ralph Meijer" <jabber.org at ralphm.ik.nu> wrote in message 
news:20060505131741.GC1099 at ik.nu...
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 12:15:41PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> In 1.8pre14 I changed it to have a wrapper element (based on some
>> feedback from Peter Millard) but I think it makes sense to change it
>> back unless people can provide a good reason for the wrapper element.
>
> What was Peter's reasoning about adding the wrapper? It seems to me that
> we used non-wrapped forms here so that clients that have generic
> JEP-0004 support can be used to boot. I don't see the added value of a
> wrapper.
>
> -- 
> Groetjes,
>
> ralphm
> 






More information about the Standards mailing list