[Standards] XEP-0108: registry?
daniel at noll.id.au
Fri Jul 6 12:20:25 UTC 2007
On Friday 06 July 2007 01:53, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> We *could* do that with the video phone activity. It's a bit of a
> borderline case, but IMHO it's going to be common enough that we want to
> define a separate activity for it.
Video phones may become common enough one day (when Cisco stop thinking the
privilege is worth paying four times the price of a normal phone, there will
probably be a boom in them) but if you want other types of phone that are
already common enough to split into their own sections, I'm sure there are
plenty. Talking on a mobile vs. talking on a landline, for instance?
Talking on a VOIP softphone vs. using a "real" phone?
> > 2. We already have presence for the other user to determine if I'm
> > contactable. i.e. can I not just set DND while on a video call?
> XEP-0108 is for things that are much more granular than <show>dnd</show>.
That's why I will suggest doing both. Set activity to "on the phone" and
status to "dnd". That's more specific than doing either independently, and
doesn't even require inventing a new type of phone which may not even add any
useful information to the other user.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Standards