[Standards] XEP-0045: roomnick case

Robin Redeker elmex at x-paste.de
Fri Jul 27 06:10:29 UTC 2007


On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:17:03AM +0530, Mridul Muralidharan wrote:
> Jack Moffitt wrote:
> >>Currently in XEP-0045, roomnicks are case-sensitive. To be precise
> >>roomnicks are handled according to the Resourceprep profile of 
> >>stringprep:
> >>
> >>http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0045.html#bizrules-jids
> >>
> >>This means that the following roomnicks are all different:
> >>
> >>StPeter
> >>stpeter
> >>STPETER
> >>
> >>Some people have pointed out that this can be confusing to end users.
> >
> >Not only this, but it's very easy to "steal" someone's identity when
> >they are not there.  You just log in with their normal nick.
> >
> >At Chesspark we make all public rooms non-anonymous and we always show
> >the full jid or (if they are in your roster) the roster nick for that
> >person.  That way no one is ever confused who is who.  So we've
> >basically solved this in the client.  All this nick stuff stuff is so
> >IRCish anyway.  It's nice if what you want is an anonymous room, but
> >for everything else, it's just a mess IMO.
> >
> >After trying several solutions we found that this was least confusing
> >to everyone and we have gotten no complaints except for the occasional
> >jerk that signs up with a name like st.peter or stpeter_, but there's
> >little you can do about that but ban the offenders.
> >
> >jack.
> 
> Unless rooms are not anonymous, clients have no way to validate who the 
> participants are anyway - so it is not really stealing : you dont 
> register the nick, it is not tied to your jid in any way.
> In anonymous rooms you dont know who the participants are - so relying 
> on nicks to give a hint of the identity would be wrong.

I guess the problem here is to explain this to the users.


Robin



More information about the Standards mailing list