[Standards] Shared Editing
Jonathan Chayce Dickinson
chayce.za at gmail.com
Tue Sep 4 08:43:32 UTC 2007
I realise that, but the /core/ way in which it works seems pretty solid?
I mean if Mozilla uses it, they should be getting pretty good results
from the concurrent editing that is going on.
We won't just clone it, we should rather adapt it. But it does seem to
work rather well.
Joonas Govenius wrote:
> On 9/3/07, Jonathan Chayce Dickinson <chayce.za at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I got an update. Have a look at mercurial, it's designed for this type
>> of stuff:
> This doesn't seem overly useful because the system is based on pulling
> changes; I think we want to push them. In particular, the merging
> described in
> seems to work only because one user pulls first.
jonathan chayce dickinson
email: chayce.za at gmail.com
jabber: moitoi at inflecto.org
<some profound piece of wisdom>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6974 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards