[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: IO DATA

Fabio Forno fabio.forno at gmail.com
Fri Apr 4 22:20:45 UTC 2008


On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Luis Peralta <peralta at spisa.act.uji.es> wrote:
>
>    Overall I like this XEP. What I missed are more possible status
>   values for the commands. Being in execution and completed is way too
>   simple for some applications. The initial state after submitting a
>   command would be 'accepted' and letting the client know that  it is in
>   fact sending commands to a batch service. IMO, the state diagram
>   should something like: accepted -> executing -> completed, even if in
>   the current spec 'executing' means both things.
>
>    I would also explicitly refer the possibility of canceling a
>  running command by using xep-50 'cancel' action.
>
>   +1 for this XEP.

I think that we can reach what you say by allowing any value in the
type attribute of the x child

-- 
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: ff at jabber.bluendo.com



More information about the Standards mailing list