[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: IO DATA
fabio.forno at gmail.com
Fri Apr 4 22:20:45 UTC 2008
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Luis Peralta <peralta at spisa.act.uji.es> wrote:
> Overall I like this XEP. What I missed are more possible status
> values for the commands. Being in execution and completed is way too
> simple for some applications. The initial state after submitting a
> command would be 'accepted' and letting the client know that it is in
> fact sending commands to a batch service. IMO, the state diagram
> should something like: accepted -> executing -> completed, even if in
> the current spec 'executing' means both things.
> I would also explicitly refer the possibility of canceling a
> running command by using xep-50 'cancel' action.
> +1 for this XEP.
I think that we can reach what you say by allowing any value in the
type attribute of the x child
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: ff at jabber.bluendo.com
More information about the Standards