[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Roster Versioning
stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Mar 6 18:09:57 UTC 2008
Dave Cridland wrote:
> On Thu Mar 6 17:25:18 2008, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Dave Cridland wrote:
>> > Then it doesn't get versioning. (BTW, I hate that name - there are no
>> > versions kept. It's not like a client can ask for a previous version,
>> > and nor does a server need to keep any previous versions).
>> I'm not wedded to that name. Feel free to suggest another. Roster diffs?
> No, you don't (really) get diffs, either. It's easy to think that a diff
> is generated between two versions, which isn't really happening.
> (Thankfully - it'd be much harder to implement if it were the case).
> Roster change sequencing, which uses a roster change sequence, and
> associates each change with a roster change sequence value?
> Or roster sequencing, etc, for a shorter term. s/version/roster-seq/
Done in version 0.2, other clarifications added as well:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards