[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Stanza Repeaters

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Fri Mar 21 17:41:53 UTC 2008


Pedro Melo wrote:

<snip/>

> Yes, pubsub and muc are the big
> winners for this, and again, I think we should drop the complex hash
> generation, or at least drop the coupling with the recipients list.

Will do.

>>> The roster at the remote host could be used as the distribution list, no
>>> need for costly updates. Just reverse-query the roster if your DB system
>>> provides that (easy for SQL-based rosters, not as simple for LDAP-based
>>> ones).
>>
>> Rosters can get out of sync. The roster at the remote host is not
>> necessarily to be trusted.
> 
> Yes, true. But keeping the rosters in sync might be a worthy goal,
> probably for a new XEP. A small extension to the initial probe, with the
> current status... Anyway, off-topic in this thread.

Yes, separate problem, but interesting. New thread, please. :)

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20080321/9c2df09d/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list