[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Stanza Repeaters
stpeter at stpeter.im
Fri Mar 21 17:41:53 UTC 2008
Pedro Melo wrote:
> Yes, pubsub and muc are the big
> winners for this, and again, I think we should drop the complex hash
> generation, or at least drop the coupling with the recipients list.
>>> The roster at the remote host could be used as the distribution list, no
>>> need for costly updates. Just reverse-query the roster if your DB system
>>> provides that (easy for SQL-based rosters, not as simple for LDAP-based
>> Rosters can get out of sync. The roster at the remote host is not
>> necessarily to be trusted.
> Yes, true. But keeping the rosters in sync might be a worthy goal,
> probably for a new XEP. A small extension to the initial probe, with the
> current status... Anyway, off-topic in this thread.
Yes, separate problem, but interesting. New thread, please. :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards