[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: IO DATA
johannes.wagener at med.uni-muenchen.de
Sun Mar 30 21:01:10 UTC 2008
Dear Fabio, thank you for your comment/clarification about the term "REST".
Fabio Forno schrieb:
> While it's true that in SOAP+XMPP specs there is no asynchronous
> message exchange pattern (and that was a mistake, though I think it's
> possible to add a new MEP), this is not related to REST. Neither the
> concept of session id is somewhat related to REST, at the contrary,
> REST explicitly forbids things like session ids. The basic principles
> of REST in fact are:
Sorry for causing confusion with this term. In conclusion we - as egon
already mentioned we will use another term and fix the sentences where
"RESTful" term was used.
More information about the Standards