[Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0198 (Stream Management)

Justin Karneges justin-keyword-jabber.093179 at affinix.com
Mon Jun 15 20:46:21 UTC 2009

On Monday 15 June 2009 12:53:35 Philipp Hancke wrote:
> XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
> [snip]
> > 5. Is the specification accurate and clearly written?
> Session resumption is only explained for c2s. Can s2s explicitly be
> declared out-of-scope due to possible interactions with multiplexing?

Are you suggesting that we should not have s2s session resumption, but you're 
okay with s2s acking?

I think we do want session resumption over s2s.  What interactions are a 
problem?  Just keep the state, whatever it is.


More information about the Standards mailing list