[Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0198 (Stream Management)
justin-keyword-jabber.093179 at affinix.com
Mon Jun 15 20:46:21 UTC 2009
On Monday 15 June 2009 12:53:35 Philipp Hancke wrote:
> XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
> > 5. Is the specification accurate and clearly written?
> Session resumption is only explained for c2s. Can s2s explicitly be
> declared out-of-scope due to possible interactions with multiplexing?
Are you suggesting that we should not have s2s session resumption, but you're
okay with s2s acking?
I think we do want session resumption over s2s. What interactions are a
problem? Just keep the state, whatever it is.
More information about the Standards