[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Remote Authentication

Kim Alvefur zash at zash.se
Thu Dec 2 15:12:33 UTC 2010


On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 07:58 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> I wonder: can that model be generalized to other extensions? (Think
> pubsub, gateways, etc.)

> > 4. The error condition is 'sasl-required'. Does this imply that
> normal MUC password auth should fail, even with a correct password?
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Because legacy MUC passwords are sent in the clear, a given MUC
> service might not want to accept that other method, but in practice I
> think they would for quite a while.

How about something new instead of `<feature
var='muc_passwordprotected'/>' to advertise SASL support.


-- 
Kim Alvefur <zash at zash.se>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20101202/e1463efc/attachment.sig>


More information about the Standards mailing list