[Standards] Fwd: Meeting minutes 2010-02-15

Kevin Smith kevin at kismith.co.uk
Thu Feb 18 10:24:51 UTC 2010


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kevin Smith
Date: Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:23 AM
Subject: Meeting minutes 2010-02-15
To: XMPP Council

Agenda: http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/council/2010-February/002756.html
Log: Sent previously by Peter
Scribe: Kev

1) Roll call.

Kev, Matt, Ralph, Remko present.
Remko left later in the meeting due to Internet and power failures.

2) Pubsub.
Votes outstanding from Dave, Matt, Ralph and Remko.

Discussion about iq stanzas for delivery, how they don't give
guaranteed delivery, and how XEP-0198 is a solution to the guaranteed
delivery problem.
Ralph -1 on the changes because of the iq issues.

3) PEP
Votes outstanding from Dave, Kev, Matt, Ralph and Remko.

Kev raised concerns about the splitting of nodes and namespaces, and
that now it'll involve advertising pubsub nodes in service discovery
features, instead of feature namespaces.

Kev +1 (despite this), votes outstanding from Dave, Matt, Ralph and Remko.

4) XEP-0237: Roster Versioning.
Accept version 1.1rc1?

Kev +1, Matt +1, Ralph +1, votes outstanding from Dave and Remko.

5) XEP1: XEPs
Council feedback is sought before board vote.

No comments.

6) Proto-XEP: Server IP Check
Accept as XEP?

Notes that this doesn't provide a client's external address reliably,
but that it might be useful for some people's use cases.
Kev, Matt and Ralph expressed no objections.

7) Jingle Relay Nodes
Accept as XEP?

Notes that this should be updated to use existing systems for e.g.
service discovery.
Kev, Matt and Ralph expressed no objections.

8) Distributed MUC
Accept as XEP?

Kev offers to send around a mail about an alternative approach to
possibly update this proposal with.
Kev, Matt and Ralph had no objections to publishing as-is, further
discussion about approaches to happen on-list.

9) Date of next meeting

22nd Feb, 7PM UTC.

10) AOB.

Peter suggests that we need a new system for XEP maintaining, and will
post on-list.


More information about the Standards mailing list