[Standards] XMPP client-centric? [was: Decloaking and Temporary Subscriptions]
joe.hildebrand at webex.com
Thu Jan 21 15:53:28 UTC 2010
On 1/21/10 4:06 AM, "Jason" <jason at hardlight.com.au> wrote:
> if xmpp supported some extra (pluggable, extensible) auth scheme
> then this could be mitigated.
You want something more pluggable and extensible than SASL?
> I dont know how to send stanzas from a component as an arbitrary user
> from an account of another domain. please tell me how! this is exactly
> what I need. (in my experience the stanza is sent but the recipient
> server rejects it, as it should).
The messages are rejected because they are spam. Why do you want to
impersonate people in another security domain? I can't think of a reason
that's not evil.
More information about the Standards